دبستان

عالی مثل همیشه با تشکر از شما استاد جوادپور عزیز و گرامی

خیلی خوشحالم باز هم رادیو دبستان با صدای گرم شما شنیدم و استفاده بردم مثل همیشه.پایدار باشید

پاینده باشید 🙏🙏🙏🙏🌷🌷🌷🌷

لذت بردم و خوشحالم از بودن و تلاش شما🙏

آرزوی سلامتی و بهروزی برای جناب جواد پور.لذت وافر بردم

ارادت فراوان دارم جناب نیما و ممنون🙏❤️

Dear dr. Javadpour, the main problem with narration (hekayet) is that it limits our scope of thinking. It is no wonder that the central tradition of our so-called intellectuals has been to lead our minds down ideological paths where our scope was limited. The problem is that we shall fight with two challenges: first, to accommodate to the new way of reasoning and learning the art of reasoning and second is to unlearn those chanks of ideological bullshits that cling to our minds. For instance, consider the ideological concept of Amir Mosaddegh Katouzian: the short-term society (Jameh Kolangi).

A killer speech!! Crafting a perfect appreciation to your efforts in elaborating concepts involves more than just saying “thank you”. I shall nonetheless say thank you so much for evolving knowledge and wisdom. Yours, Avesta

Dear Dr Javadpor, In one of your podcasts, your remarks about speech and "talking" remind me of Nathan. Salmón's works. I hope you will expand on his works since he is a philosopher. I wish you a good health and an endless happiness. Avesta

The stated remarks presuppose that there is a mental and societal state where, on some occasions, purposeful actions lead to unanticipated consequences. Let us take Iranian intellectuals in the '60s and '70s, who intended democracy, freedom, etc., and fought for these values but turned to something opposite. I want to examine if there is a correlation between unanticipated consequences of intellectual sociopolitical actions and the three types of intellectual pathways. Thank you so much Avesta

Dear Dr. Javadpour Do you think there is a correlation between the unintended consequences of the sociopolitical action of Iranian intellectuals in the last century and the type of intellectual tradition they adopted in their purposeful action? What I mean is whether there is a correlation between the unanticipated consequences, as R. K. Merton suggested, and the type of intellectual tradition they adopted: intellectuals in themselves, classless intellectuals, or class-bound intellectuals. I have an intellectual project related to this topic. I hope I will be able to conduct it properly, and I would appreciate your thoughts about it. Thank you so much for your efforts.

A killer speech !! It is always interesting to hear something about the shallow intellectual tradition in Iran. Thank you so much Avesta

.I enjoyed it ....The best way to pay for the lovely moment you created is to enjoy

Dear Dr. Javadpour, It was so interesting that you made a connection between ideology and the proximity of concepts in the mind of ordinary individuals. The proximity principle in psychology describes the way relationships are formed between things close to one another. In Gestalt psychology, the proximity principle is one of several Gestalt principles of perceptual organisation and states that people treat objects close together as a group. In social psychology, the proximity principle suggests that people closer together in a physical environment are more likely to form a relationship than those farther away. I highly appreciate your effort in pinpointing this vital concept that was toxic in the way of pure thinking in Iran. Thank you so much and wish you all the best Regards Avesta

Dear Dr Javadpour, I have finally connected to your podcast. I Start listning it from the beginning. I hope I have not missed the critical point as time passed and my negligence hindered me from acquiring knowledge. I wish you all the best